reclaiming wife

Archive for May, 2010

Sponsored Post

So. I don't think I've ever done this, in the history of the site, but we're doing it today - I'm letting Kristy, of Moodeous Photography in Denver, talk to you guys in her own words. Normally, before I write a sponsored post, I have new wedding elves write a little something for me about why they do what they do, and why they want to work with APW brides. And then I get writing. But when I asked Kristy to do this, she sent me something so lovely and so thoughtful, that it deserved to stand totally on it's own.


Things you should know about Kristy (that's Kristy up there!) She's in Colorado, but she travels for the cost of transportation and accommodations. She's been reading APW a long long time, and finally, really shyly, emailed me to say that she loved APW so much, she wanted to get brave and be a sponsor. Since then she and I have had many an email chat, and she rocks. Oh, and she's affordable. BUT! It actually gets better. Kristy, because she's generous and awesome, wants to offer an APW LQBTQ couple free wedding photography. The details, and her heartfelt reasons for doing so, are at the bottom of this post. Oh, ANNNNDDDDD, she wants you guys to pick the recipient, via your "exactly" buttons, in the same way you've started doing with dress giveaways. So, interested parties, please leave a comment, and everyone else, go read and get weepy and hit exactly again and again, yes? For those of you who don't remember, here is the last Team Practical couple that got a LGBTQ wedding photography giveaway, during those brief happy days when same sex marriage was legal in California. And now, Kristy:

I shot my first wedding at 17. It was terrifying and I knew I would never ever do it again... until 2005, when a friend asked me to shoot her wedding and I found myself smiling as I looked through the camera. The whole day I grinned ear to ear. Now, at every wedding, I'm be grinning like a fool behind that lens. I can't help myself. It's so much goodness all around me, I just get soaked it in. The look in Mom's eyes as rings are placed and vows are taken. When a couple gazes into one another's eyes during toasts or a quiet moment. The joy that overwhelms and shows itself in happy tears. A chorus of voices agreeing to support this union for years to come. And somehow I'm invited to share in these moments, capture these precious things for everyone to hold on to for a lifetime. I tear up at most weddings, not always during the ceremony. Sometimes it's during the first dance, or toasts or the father daughter dance, or the first time a bride puts on her dress. Life has somehow graced me with the good fortune of capturing it's most emotive bits.

As I've started to build my business I've been lucky to mostly pair with couples who I can consider friends. Couples who just get it. They've chosen to make a deep and abiding commitment to one another. The marriage is what's important to them and the people who will be there to help them along the way. Many of my clients are in graduate school, on a tight budget and generally focused on a simple celebration with their family and friends. My clients include: brides that have borrowed their dresses from friends, made their invitations by hand, purchased their flowers at the local grocery store, asked friends to make their favors, are gardening the hell out of their yard so their reception can be held there, asked friends to serve as vendors, had their wedding in a lodge at the YMCA.... and generally have the sensibility and smarts I see prevail on APW.

But the wedding industry scares me. As I've slowly begun to build my own business I've done a lot of "second" shooting with other photographers. At these weddings I've seen the bride and groom's initials intertwined as a logo, projected in beams of light onto the dance floor, swirling around and changing colors. I've seen ice sculptures surrounded by raw bars. Vera Wang and Monique Lhuillier dresses with those shoes that I can't remember the brand name of, but you know. These are the weddings that so many photographers aspire to photograph. Because they're "pretty". Because the high cost of silk table linens, uplighting, chandeliers and gilded chairs make "better" photos. The kind one could get printed in a magazine.
I've been told that if I raise my prices I'll get "prettier" weddings. I've been told that if I get "prettier" weddings I'll get more publicity and therefore more (higher paying) clients. Ick. F*ck that Sh*t.

In short (finally), I don't want to photograph weddings for that reason. I choose to photograph weddings, because of the relationship I establish with my clients. Because of the importance of the day and the individual approach of each couple I meet. Because ultimately grocery store flowers and target shoes are beutiful, when they're being worn by a glowing bride and groom who know this wedding is about LOVE, COMMITMENT, LIFE, FAMILY, and BIG CHOICES.

So go browse, yes?

And now, the details of the giveaway:

Two of my earliest and most influential family members weren't blood relatives. But they were still my "Uncles", Chris and Derek. Both have since passed losing the battle to HIV and then AIDS. At a very early age they taught me you can have love and a life together without marriage. Unfortunately for them it wasn't a choice. It was their reality. This is one of the many reasons photographing a gay wedding is important to me. I'd love to hear from anyone having a gay wedding in Colorado, so I can offer my services free of charge to one deserving couple. I'm happy to have the APW community do the choosing, as they have dutifully weighed in on the dress giving in the past. I will post details of what I'm offering on my site. Essentially it's up to 8 hours of coverage, hi res photos on disc and travel up to 100 miles. Continue reading Sponsor Introduction: Moodeous Photography & Colorodo LGBTQ Photography Giveaway

Ok, so I never thought I would say this. But. I, um, picked up the May issue of Esquire. And it was REALLY good. I'm still sort of horrified, honestly, given, say, their website. But, I'm a huge fan of (at least the non-fiction parts) of McSweeny's annual compendium Best American Nonrequired Reading. Big fan. And I've noticed that lots of the non-fiction was being sourced from Esquire... and really good non-fiction at that. So, there I was, in my local independent bookstore, and I noticed that Christina Hendricks was on the cover of Women (the issue). So I thought, hey, why not? And ladies? It was excellent.

I would describe the thesis as "Women: You're way way more interesting than you think you are."

So, for you, on this Friday, a few highlights.

....

As part of their "5 Moments: A group portrait of five ages in the lives of women," ages 18, 27, 35, 44, and 53, one of the 35 year-olds said, "In my 20s, I spent years building someone else's world. I wasted those years." I haven't been able to get that out of my head for two weeks.

....

As part of their (fascinating, I thought. We're interesting creatures...) Survey of the American Woman, I noticed that 47% of the women surveyed made less than their husband/ boyfriend/ partner. And my forehead wrinkled up for a second.

Me: So. 47% of women make less than their partners.

David: Hum?

Me: I make more than you right now. Well. I mean, I make all of it right now. (Pause). But. I think I like making more than you. (Pause). I think... if I had it my way, I'd like to always make the most. (Pause). That's weird. (Pause). Is that awful?

David: Nope.

Me: Would you mind?

David: Nope.

Me: That's ok?

David: Yeah. You just like making money. I don't care so much.

It's interesting, working out the surprising-to-yourself things you think about your own marriage. I mean, I thought I wanted to be a stay at home mom. Till, like, this week. Seriously (and when I say seriously, I mean seriously. So please don't judge me or say I have a problem with staying home with your kids. I thought I would until Tuesday). Apparently David had foreseen that this was not actually what I wanted. That I wanted, um, capitalism. Apparently.

....

Finally from Christina Hendricks "Letter to Men": Continue reading Esquire’s (I know…) Issue on Women

Hello All-

For whatever reason, just now, washing the dishes I was overcome with the feeling that today was the day to put out my little 'blanket apology/here is what's up' post. Basically, APW is growing. Kind of... faster than I'd expected after the re-launch. That is, in many ways, a huge joy. I love APW, I love you guys, I love all the writing and thinking out loud I get to do here, I love the amazing community discussions, I love the profound guests posts that I have the honor of sharing with the world.

But. I'm still just one girl on one laptop over here, same as I was on day one. And as someone supporting a small household in a rather expensive city while her husband does eminently worthwhile things like study for one of the hardest bars in the US, and figure out what's next... well... I'm working around the clock. I go to work all day, and then I come home to a overloaded inbox, a million smart comments, posts that need to be written, and lovely sponsors (who make it all possible) that need to be tended too. Not to mention the small pile of APW side projects that I'm really supposed to be working on, but haven't had time to touch this month.

So. All of this is to say - if I haven't answered your email, or posted your wedding graduate post.... I'm probably wallowing in guilt about it (even, if you say, emailed me back in January with a really good question about your husband not wanting a wedding ring. See? I read things! I remember!) So PLEASE don't think that I didn't think your email was cool enough, or your wedding blog-worthy* enough, and that's why I didn't email you back. PLEASE. Because I swear to you, it was awesome. So awesome that I thought, "hum, I need to find a moment where I can think to email them back" (those of you who have gotten emails from me know that I'm incapable of not being chatty), or "hum, I need to find the right week to put this wedding up."

None of this is to say that you should pity me (God no!). But just know, I adore you and your emails and weddings and comments. It's just that I'm a better person (and, um, writer) if I also sleep and shower. Yes?

Smooches,

Meg

*gag

Today, Lisa of Privilege returns, talking about HOW to deal with, what shall we call it? A delicate situation with your Mother In Law. Yesterday she wrote about possible reasons, from the mother end of the spectrum, why said delicate situation might exist. If you haven't read that yet, you might want to catch up first. Lisa talks about a lot of important things here - like the protecting of the baby family (this takes practice, and will probably be sloppy at first, but will pay dividends for years. Imagine if it were a baby and not a wedding that you were discussing. Exactly). Lisa talks about all this from the perspective of wedding planning, but I think what she says is equally useful for those of us who are (blessedly) done with the wedding circus. Now, onwards to the ever fabulous Lisa (When is her book of essays and advice coming out, anyway? Achem.)

....

B.

So. What to do, as a planning bride faced with a mother-in-law? A bride wrestling with her own family of origin, her own identity as represented by her vintage wedding dress, to say nothing of, um, a new marriage? In times of stress and high emotion, I resort to extreme rationality.

Here are some assumptions.

1.    The most important thing is your relationship with your partner. He or she should also believe this.
2.    You do want to facilitate as much happiness for your mother-in-law as possible.
3.    You are willing to approach this project with your best, most rational self in place.

Of course, you might wonder, why facilitate happiness for your MIL? Other than the general rule of Be Nice Whenever Possible? Because. You want: a) to  thank her for spilling her blood giving birth to your spouse b) to smooth the way for a good future relationship. Some day she might be the grandmother to your kids. Good grandmothers are invaluable, and worth any reasonable investment that practical wedding planning can provide. She will always be the mother of your spouse. And mothers run deep.

Here are a few recommendations.

1.    Before you begin to involve any extended family in planning, cloister yourself with your intended.
2.    Agree on 2-3 non-negotiable values for your wedding. (These might change, but the discussion will set necessary context.)
3.    Agree on 2-3 details that you both think you really care about. (Again, things change, a place to start is good.)
4.    Agree on with what strings you are willing to accept any money from your partner's parents, and on the best way to communicate this. (Only if it's completely yours to do with as you will? Willing to have discussions as long as you get the final call? Amenable to concessions? Remember, we've spent a lot of money on your spouse over the years and we always used to get a say in how it was spent.)
5.    Now, and only now, open up the phone lines.

Because if you are going to have mother-in-law issues, or mother issues for that matter, a united front is useful. In fact, a united front will be not only useful, but devastatingly important for your entire marriage. And united rarely means floating blissfully in agreement. It usually means bashing it out, at one point, or another, or many.

Here are the details. The juicy part, if you will.

Imagine the easy mothers-in-law. Because clearly some people are more evolved and more adult than others. If you've got an adult for a mother-in-law, defined as one who puts her love for her child over the rest of her personal agenda, proceed as you would in any job with a matrixed management structure. Continue reading Ask Meg (and she’ll ask someone else): Mothers-In-Law, Part II

To say Miss Emily, of Emily Takes Photos (she just goes by Emily, obviously, but sometimes I call full grown people Miss out of fondness) was the inaugural photographer of APW would be exaggerating. But only by a tiny bit. I'm not even sure how Emily first started reading this blog, but she did in the first few months of it's existence. She was a photo student then, and I was sort of a student blogger. Really early on she let me run her friends wedding at a lighthouse, which I think is one of the first weddings she ever shot. And then, for a dollar and a song, she came on as one of APW's very first advertisers.... and sweet-baby-jesus, it's sort of amazing to see where we are now. Where we are now, includes, among other things, David and making out in the banner of her blog, but, details.

Every summer, Emily Takes Photos shoots approximately as many APW weddings as she has weekends to shoot. And every fall I get inundated with emails from you guys about how much you adore Emily, and how you want everyone to know about her, and how she actually does affordable stylish wedding photography, and wow-wow-wowie. And then Emily tells me these stories about how she goes to photography conventions and gushes, "Don't you love shooting weddings? Arn't wedding couples just the best, funniest, most grounded, kindest people you've ever met? Don't you feel like you're insta-friends with your clients the second you meet them?" And she says people look at her with a glassy eyed stare and say things like, "No, nut-job, brides are bananas." And then she thinks, "Awww.... APW...."

Oh, and for the record, she's even starting regularly hanging out with APW readers and Wedding Elves that she met at the meetup, and nicely inviting me along when she does it. She may take over Team Practical Bay Area. I'm on notice.

But today's post is actually not about how you love Emily and I love Emily and Emily takes great photos. Today's post is about how up till now, Emily has only really been the property of Northern California team practical couples, and.... drumrolll please.... Emily has decided she wants to see the world, so she's offering a bad-ass travel deal to APW couples. Let me quote the girl herself:

Now that I'm done with school and work mostly from home, getting out of the house is a big deal.  Like, I look forward to putting on pants and heading to the post office.  But I have bigger dreams than pants and the post office, so I'm itching to get out and TRAVEL!  I'm offering 20% off my full-day packages* for any wedding that requires me to get on a plane/train/rocket-powered bicycle (ie: not in the SF bay area). Weddings must be booked by August 31, 2010 (though the wedding itself can be anytime future).  *Travel fees apply separately.


And just for the record, I checked with her about travel fees (I was once quoted a one day wedding travel fee that *literally* would have taken me to Italy for two weeks. No joke). Anyway, Emily is NOT actually planning to go to Italy with your travel fee. She's just planning to travel like a normal person, and come to your wedding. So don't be scared. Now email her already.... and send me the pictures after, yes? Now, a picture I've never showed you of us, to take us out, after the jump: Continue reading Sponsored Post: Emily Takes Photos (And The Great APW Travel Deal)

Often, I get requests for posts on excellent questions, to which I have no answers. One of those excellent questions, which keeps coming up over and over, is the question of the Mother-In-Law. The most common variant of the question I here is this, "Back when we were just dating, I had a good relationship with my mother-in-law. She was nice, we were friendly, things were good. Then we got engaged, and sweet-baby-jesus-what-happened?" Sometimes the problem is that your mother-in-law became overtly, um, crazy, and started with the screaming and the bossing and the crying and the throwing things. More often the problem is that the relationship just became tense. Super tense. Either way, the question is "WHY?" followed by a plaintive, "How do I fix it?"

Since you know, I've only been a wedding graduate for 10 months now, and I've never been a mother.... I have no idea. So. Because it was a really good question, I thought really hard about who might have a really good answer. And I decided that LPC, who writes over at Privilege, was definitely the ticket. LPC is fantastic (like, real life fantastic, she gets drinks with me and gives me advice regularly) LPC's kids are in, and just out, of college, and she's not in danger of becoming a mother-in-law any time soon. But in my head, that made her perfect. She was a neutral party. She could look on both sides of the fence, say "Hum" very thoughtfully, and then write something honest and helpful. Well, she outdid herself. So the Mother-In-Law post comes to you in two parts. Today is Why, tomorrow is How.

...

A.

If you are having trouble with your mother-in-law, as you plan your wedding, this is not why.

These are my children almost 20 years ago, and this picture can make me cry in 90 seconds. Your mother-in-law has one just like this, somewhere, of your spouse-to-be. Maybe without the hats. And it wails like a banshee in her heart. This wailing is hard to understand in the non-faerie world in which we live, but it's real, to moms.

People will pretend mothers-in-laws-to-be are bad about your wedding because our banshees are wailing, because we love our children and you are taking them. That is hogwash. Hogwash.

Well, on second thought, sometimes we're bad because of banshees. But only when we first meet you. When our children tell us they are marrying you, we may think you won't take care of these people who have left their baby selves in our hearts. At those moments, we might act up. But once we decide that 1) you are the best person for our child, or 2) you aren't but we can't make their choices for them, our love for our kids will actually make us behave well. As you plan your wedding, and whenever good behavior is required. Continue reading Ask Meg (and she’ll ask someone else): Mother-In-Laws, Part I