Stop Blaming Huma for Her Husband’s Epic Fail(s)

Yesterday morning, I woke up to the delightful Page One New York Times print headline, “Weiner’s Texts Cast a New Shadow Over Clinton Campaign.”

Of course the obvious response was, “HOW? HOW IS THAT? HOW COULD THAT POSSIBLY BE?”, which I screamed at my newspaper over breakfast. But beyond that, I found myself fuming, once again, about how we blame women for not only all of the things we perceive as personal failings (including but not limited to: working for a living, not raising perfect children, not always having perfectly smooth hair, etc.), but also for all of men’s personal failings. (Here: being literally unable to keep photos of your erection off the Internet for the course of a campaign.)

Weiner Had One Goddamn Job

For those of you not up on the details, TL;DR: Anthony Weiner, host of an unfortunate enough name that you would assume he would have spent his life studiously avoiding dick jokes, BUT NO SUCH LUCK, has now been outed in not one, not two, but THREE sexting scandals. One that took down his career as a congressman, one that took back his comeback campaign for mayor of New York (and provided us with the tell-way-too-much documentary Weiner), and a third that has now taken down his marriage to his ever-patient-with-his-mortifying-antics wife, Huma Abedin. All of this would be same old, same old: man in power who can’t seem to keep an appropriate leash on his sexuality. Except in this case, his wife is the more powerful of the duo. Huma Abedin is Hillary Clinton’s right hand woman and adviser, currently the vice-chairwoman on her presidential campaign, and we hope soon-to-be primary adviser to the president of the United States.

In short, Anthony, she’s busy. Too busy to divorce your ass right now just this second, because she’s got shit to do (don’t worry, though: she’ll get around to you when she has the time). Some of us, Anthony, have a whole country to save… while you apparently just have all the time in the world to be sexting pictures of your damn groin… this time with your son in your bed.

You’d think, of course, the only person to lay blame on in this situation would be Weiner himself. Particularly since Huma did everything women are “supposed” to do, citing religious beliefs as the reason she stayed to work on (and work on) her marriage. As for Weiner, he literally had one job between now and the election: keep his dick in his pants, and not take pictures of it. Or two, if you count the fact that according to Huma, he’s the stay-at-home dad that makes her work possible.

“Many working moms feel this way — there is a lot of guilt,” she said. “I don’t think I could do it if I didn’t have the full support system I have, if Anthony wasn’t willing to be, essentially, a full-time dad.”

So let’s make that: no more sexting, and help raise their son, ideally while not sexting anyone photos of any part of his body. (See how that all boils down to one really very simple directive?)

But no. NOOOOOOOOOO. According to the media this isn’t only Weiner’s fault. Apparently, somehow, Huma is to blame. And you know what? It’s hard to sort through all the things she’s to blame for. But let me present you this short, but by no means exhaustive, list.

A Short List Of Why It’s Really Huma’s Fault

She’s a bad mother for working, according to the Washington Post. (Notwithstanding the fact that somebody has to make a living, and Weiner can’t seem to hold down a job.)

And for the third time, his questionable decisions are ensnaring his wife, one of Hillary Clinton’s top aides, by raising questions about her decision to leave their son in a potentially dangerous situation.

Plus, Weiner’s inability to keep it in his pants “casts a shadow” on her… ethics? Or her ability to do her job? Or so hints the New York Times:

Mr. Weiner’s tawdry activities may have claimed his marriage — Ms. Abedin told him that she wanted to separate — and have cast another shadow on the adviser and confidante who has been by Mrs. Clinton’s side for the past two decades.

Add to that, Weiner (whom we must note is not in any way a Clinton staffer, but instead a stay-at-home dad for one of her staffers, and how we wish he didn’t have access to the Internet or photographic devices), is somehow causing Huma to cause spectacular drama inside the campaign, or so reports the LA Times:

The media attention erupting around Abedin right now, though, is not Breitbart’s making. It is the kind of spectacular staff drama the Clinton operation had been so good at avoiding during her presidential run over the last year and a half, the kind associated with previous campaigns of both Bill and Hillary Clinton.

And last not but not least, Trump is flat-out saying (because he never bothers to just “imply”) that somehow Huma has threatened national security, because she has a security clearance. As someone who grew up with a father with a high security clearance, I’d like to note that people assume men can manage to not share national secrets with their wives, but apparently this assumption does not work the other way around? To wit:

At a fundraiser in Massachusetts last August, Trump insisted that there was no chance that Abedin had not divulged classified information to Weiner since, he said, any woman who is “in love with” her husband would certainly do so.

All this makes me so angry I’m shaking. Not because I’m a Democrat (though I am one), or because of its political bent. It makes me livid because like many women, I live variations on this story every day of my life.

Yes, All Women

As a mother of two small children and a business owner—and, you know, as a human who has to shower and such—you’d think I’d rather clearly be at my limit on things that are actually my responsibility. But yet, society somehow manages to regularly hold me responsible for my husband’s actions as well… not to mention the very many tasks we should both be equally accountable for. Is his career progressing well? (My own career never seems particularly relevant to folks.) Is he dressed well? (Clearly I must buy him his clothing, so, on me.) Is he getting enough billable hours in at work? (If not, am I taking time off my own work to make that happen?) Are our children getting appropriate childcare and time with a loving parent? (Again, me.) Is our house clean? (Duh, me.) Is our social life well organized? (Who do you think?) Did everyone get a birthday card and a wedding gift? (Um, me.)

beyonce

Don’t Hurt Yourself

All of which led me to look up from the New York Times in a cold rage, fix my eyes on my innocent husband, and say, “If you think you could ever, ever, ever get away with this crap without feeling the full brunt of my fury, think twice.”

The media seems to think that this story of yet another smart, powerful woman being taken down a peg by her husband’s sexual exploits is going to somehow remind me… to not vote for women. Here’s some bullshit via the New York Times:

Mr. Weiner’s extramarital behavior also threatens to remind voters about the troubles in the Clintons’ own marriage over the decades, including Mrs. Clinton’s much-debated decision to remain with then-President Bill Clinton after revelations of his relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Ms. Abedin’s choice to separate from her husband evokes the debates that erupted over Mrs. Clinton’s handling of the Lewinsky affair, a scandal her campaign wants left in the past.

In fact, this coverage leaves me wanting nothing more than for Huma to finally leave her husband (on it), take her kid, and start a daycare center next to the Oval Office. I’ve already searched the Internet for “HRC Fanfic Leaving Bill,” but thus far, no hits.

Till I find that fanfic, excuse me while I watch Beyoncé burn it down, while meditating on killing her husband at the VMAs. Or, as Ann Friedman tweeted, “Stuck on a plane on the O’Hare runway & may never breathe fresh air again but it’s ok because Huma is free and can breathe for all womankind.” Breathe, Huma. Breathe and rise.

P.S. Men? Talk to your people. Get correct. Because my distinct sense is that the future is female, starting soon with Huma and Hillary.

25 Stunning (and Affordable) BHLDN Dresses for Under $1K

35939156_011_c

Adona Dress ($570)

When I was getting married, way back in the pre-Pinterest dark days of 2009, shopping for wedding dresses was a particular kind of horror for someone without a billion dollars at their disposal. I learned the hard way that while $500 or $1,000 (or even $2,000) might seem like a whole lot of money to put some clothes on your back, in the bizarro world of wedding dresses, those numbers were somehow considered “budget.” (How? How?!) And even still, the biggest problem wasn’t the cost. It was that almost every dress in my price range was either a cupcake-y ballgown (not my jam) or so minimal that you could see my, um, anatomy through the fabric.

But bless the Internet. Because now the problem with wedding dress shopping, if any, is that of too many options. Sleeves! Jumpsuits! Dresses not inspired by pastry! And if APW had to pick a staff favorite? It would probably be BHDLN. Because their $500 dresses are often even more stylish than the $3,500 ones, and your APW staff has hardcore champagne tastes on a Keystone Light budget. (At least in wedding dresses. You do, actually, only wear them once.) Plus, BHLDN dresses are sold off the rack (aka in your street size), so you can order them and return them if they don’t fit or look right. You know, like normal shopping. So, since BHLDN just launched their new fall line, and because I’m not getting married and you are, we’ve rounded up twenty-five of our favorite BHLDN dresses under $1K (plus fifteen bonus dresses for under $2K, because $2,000 is still bizarrely cheap in the world of weddings). How’s that for options?

Wedding Dresses Under $1K

39567870_011_c

Landry Dress ($560) 

38044954_011_d

Mara Jumpsuit ($280)

37760758_065_d

Coppelia Dress ($260)

37595295_011_c

Reagan Gown ($975)

39533922_011_a

Cristiane Gown ($800)

39329263_011_d

Alice Gown ($990)

39582515_011_a

Billie Dress ($420)

39330238_011_d

Naomi Gown ($800)

37783354_095_a

Paulette Dress ($490)

35322726_011_c

Cate Gown ($800)

38446704_013_b

Coral Jumpsuit ($540)

39410105_011_c

Julianne Gown ($800)

39496120_011_e

Ingrid Velvet Gown ($900)

20160105-tulleyamora_c

Tulley Top & Amora Skirt ($220–$600)

38003919_065_c

Brisa Dress ($370)

37634102_011_a

Frida Dress ($800)

37830304_011_g

Mina Gown ($700)

39482716_011_c

Jackie Jumpsuit ($240)

38613352_013_c

Naya Dress, center ($350)

37249596_011_a

Roane Gown ($700)

NJR_P01261_09_241-1

Ilona Dress ($480)

20150211_annabellemarnie_b

Annabelle Dress & Marnie Topper ($220–$260)

39492756_011_c

Loretta Shift Dress ($520)

39362579_013_a

Larkin Gown ($850)

Wedding Dresses Under $2K

39501978_011_e

Monica Gown ($1,550)

20160308-biancaandahsan_a

Bianca Top & Ahsan Skirt ($220–$1,860)

39905781_011_d

Hayden Gown ($2,025. I cheated, but I regret nothing.)

37600996_011_g

Jolie Gown ($1,400)

NJR_P01261_17_108-1

Fantasia Gown ($1,500)

39495353_011_d

Freya Gown ($2,000)

37820313_012_d

Ariane Gown ($1,400)

36104636_011_d

Bridgette Gown ($1,600)

37595659_011_c

Petra Gown ($1,150)

39364823_011_d

Elisha Gown ($1,700)

37869294_011_d

Cibella Gown ($2,000)

39550744_013_a

Rosanna Gown ($1,300)

39031042_011_d

Tabitha Gown ($1,700)

39533237_065_d

Nina Gown ($1,200)

39707674_012_d

Teagan Gown ($1,050)

Bonus, because you need it:

39800669_070_a

Sonora Capelet ($170)

This content was not sponsored by BHLDN. However, it does contain affiliate links (which, simply put, help APW pay the bills any time you click and then complete a purchase).