Alyssa is back with Ask Team Practical Fridays, and today we're tackling the father-daughter dance. This was an interesting subject to tackle. Alyssa had a father-daughter-dance and it meant a lot to her. I didn't even consider having a father-daughter-dance (though we had a family dance, more on that to come), because like a lot of complicated gender issues, it made me super uncomfortable. So, I can tell you that, hands down, this has been the most debated and most talked over Ask Team Practical column ever. And I'm happy with what we came up with. So lets dive in.
Today we have the following question from Amanda:
I am planning my wedding for next October, and have started thinking about which traditions I wanted to incorporate into our ceremony and reception. One thing I am really struggling with is the Father-Daughter dance. On the one hand, I can see how that tradition could be very important to my dad. On the other hand, I find the tradition to be a little creepy, and I can think of about a million other things I would rather do with those 3 minutes. It seems like a vestige of the system of fathers' ownership of their daughters, with the dance being the last exercise of dominance (I am also leaning towards having both my parents walking me down the aisle instead of just my dad for the same reason). I was wondering if anyone over at Team Practical knew anything about the history of the father-daughter dance? Do you have any recommendations on how to have this conversation with my dad?
Well, Amanda, I did some preliminary searching for you, but I couldn't find any concrete evidence that the father-daughter dance has any real basis as an exercise in dominance. I could search further, but I'll let you do that if you're truly interested in its roots. (Plus, ten bucks says some savvy reader will give us an answer, possibly with links.) But let's discuss tradition for a second.
In the end, does the history of a tradition matter? Walking a bride down the aisle definitely has its root in ownership and dominance, but sometimes a tradition is a tradition because a lot of people started doing it all the time. Even if there are sinister roots, there comes a point when something doesn't hold its original meaning anymore, when that's not what people think of when it occurs. There comes a point when we can grab a hold of a tradition and say, "F*ck it, this is OURS and it means whatever the hell I say it means." For example, if you pay attention to what a tradition originally meant and assume that it still holds that meaning, wouldn't both your parents walking you down the aisle mean that you're contributing to the notion that they both own you and are handing you over? Maybe, but that's clearly not what's happening at your wedding. You are asking your parents to take you on a final walk before you head into the next part of your journey as an adult, right?
So it's possible for the father-daughter dance be just that: a tradition that may or may not have roots in sexism, but is now a chance for you to have a brief public moment with your father. I can guarantee that none of your guests would think, "Ah. He doesn't own her anymore, now her husband does," as you dance with your father to "Wind Beneath My Wings." (And anyone who does has deeper issues and should be ignored.)
But the problem is that YOU may well think of that as you dance with your father, or heck, you might just not be comfortable with that (Meg wasn't, she requests that you don't get her started on the subject.) You're already having both your parents walk you down the aisle, so there is no reason for you to force the issue with a father-daughter dance. That makes it seem simple, which it isn't always. And you know that, so that's why you're writing to Team Practical.





























































