Ya'll, it's Friday. Amazing spring-is-finally-here Friday (we're having a heat wave in San Francisco, which is so rare here that the whole city practically grinds to a halt and we all eat outdoors nonstop). But that's not the only reason to rejoice! It's also Ask Team Practical Friday with Alyssa, and she is rocking it out today with three questions (I love when she does three questions). Plus, I'm answering questions too (and not just by sneaking in sentences when I edit, like I usually do). So let's get on this.
My wedding is long over, but there's one thing about the otherwise fantastic day that still bothers me. I briefly saw several people before the ceremony who seemed to disappear before the reception started, and I never had time to chat with them or thank them for coming. When I asked my mother later about one family in particular, she said that they were under the impression that they were only invited to the ceremony. What?!? The ceremony and reception were in the same room, and the invitation said "Reception immediately following."
I've since learned that a number of people left immediately after the ceremony. I didn't really notice not seeing most of them, but I do remember thinking that there were a lot of empty tables at the reception. I'm totally confused. Did I somehow make a mistake when writing my invitations? Is it common for some guests to leave after the ceremony? Did I just have a really boring reception? I've been torturing myself for months with thoughts that my guests think I was rude enough to only invite them to the ceremony. Some of those who left are people I had really hoped to see and celebrate with. Also, we had so much leftover food and cake, which means that we spent far more money than we needed to. I'm hoping that you'll have some insight into where I went wrong, so that the wedding undergraduates out there can learn from my mistake. Also, I want to finally stop worrying about this. Thanks!
-Worried About A Cold Reception in Kentucky
Dear WAACRIK,
You're lucky, because you get two answers for your question! One from Meg and one from Alyssa. You win. Maybe because you have a fun sign-off to your letter. Achem (get on that people!)
Alyssa:
Sweetie,
I'm at a loss here. I realize that etiquette rules are not always as clear as they may have once appeared, but "Reception immediately following" is pretty darn clear. I can only think of a couple of reasons for your disappearing guests.
1. Your guests are liar-liar-pants-on-fires. They had other plans that day and are too chicken to tell you or admit it to your mother.
2. Your guests are morons.
To find out, your only recourse would be to actually get ahold of the people who left and ask them what was up. You can either say, " I didn't get a chance to see you at my reception, did you have fun?" or "HEY. Why'd you bail on my reception, yo?" But what kind of answer would satisfy you? The kind where they go back in time and go to your wedding reception? So. Right. Maybe don't ask.
Just remember the good times that you did have. And that you didn't commit any breach of etiquette or make a mistake. Your guests did come to your ceremony and saw the most important part of a wedding. They missed out on an amazing time and that's their fault, the losers. And now I'm going to kick this to Meg, because she knows a thing or two about this.
Meg:
My dear WAACRIK,
I'm going to clue you into a closely held secret of wedding planning: some wedding guests are dicks. It has nothing to do with you, or your kick-ass wedding, or the clarity of your invitation. Some people just don't get that weddings are important, don't care, and can't be bothered.
How do I know this? Well. We had some wedding no-shows. Here is the sum up: we had people who skipped the ceremony and just showed for the free food and booze. (Unluckily for them we were taking pictures at the entrance when they walked in, so they had to walk right by us to get in. So, awkward for them, but kind of hilarious for us.) We had people who skipped the whole thing because they "had a day" (seriously). We had people who went to the reception, ate as fast as they could, and then stood up and announced (announced!) that they were leaving. Excellent.
You know what that means? That means some people are *ss-hats. In some cases we learned things about our friendships that we were not sure we wanted to know (which oddly, was ok, because we learned that other friends are so much more awesome than we'd ever imagined). In other cases we learned that some of our friends are sh*tacular at weddings, but are still awesome at being our friends, and we're ok with that. In some cases we learned who was lacking in social graces. But in no case did we learn that our wedding was boring, or we were bad hosts, or even that we shouldn't have invited these people. Because with something as big as a wedding (or a family, or a circle of friends), things just go wrong.
But fundamentally? People skipping your reception and making idiotic excuses (or your ceremony, for that matter) doesn't mean a d*mn thing about you, or how clear you were in your invitations, or how awesome your wedding was. So I absolutely refuse to allow you to spend one more second worrying about that. Go back and look at an awesome wedding picture. Something like this:
{Me dancing at our wedding! By One Love Photo! Forget jerky wedding guests!}
And remember how it felt, and let the rest go. The end.
*************
I am considering asking my caterer if she would be willing to barter her services. Not all of them, just perhaps a reduction in the cost in exchange for free labor on my part. Continue reading Ask Team Practical: Disappearing Guests and Vendor Expectations





































































